Most of us, me included, are born blind into the teaching profession, and like a litter of mice pass through our careers working hard to make a real difference, yet having very little knowledge of what has come and gone before our time. By their very nature, schools and school districts recall very little of their organizational history. Lacking that perspective, we also lack an understanding of the context of our own times. Without context it is very difficult to comprehend the full meaning of what we do, and we chase each trend or innovation as if it is brand new. Sometimes we stand on the shoulders of giants in education. Sometimes we stand on the shoulders of dolts. We do not always know the difference.
I count myself among those who completed the required courses of History of Education and Philosophy of Education but remember very little of them. We were focused on more urgent concerns. Will I learn to create engaging lessons? Will I be able to manage a class well and motivate children? Even
as we struggle up the learning curve, we are quickly submerged in the urgent demands of the school culture. What time remains for reflection?
This timeline is intended to address the need to understand how our time in teaching fits both into the history of our profession and the events of our national history. There are parallels as you will see. There are competing ideologies more than a century old, which are still not resolved. It cannot possibly include all issues and events. In that sense the timeline will always be incomplete, subjective, and a work in progress, though it is the result of countless hours of reading and lived experience. It is intended to generate lively discussion, and debate over different interpretations of shared events. We need to use our history purposefully to make grounded decisions going forward.
Andrew Hatt, House Principal Mahopac High School 1993-2014
Humanist ideology prevalent:
• Develop the intellect
• Train students to control natural impulses
• Content valued over process
• The role of school was to transmit cultural heritage to the next generation
• Students were passive learners
Curriculum status quo was the doctrine of “mental discipline.” Christian Wolf, 1740: The mind was equated to a muscle. By teaching classics, Greek, Latin, and Math, one exercised and strengthened faculties of the mind, such as memory, reasoning, will, and imagination. This was known as the “transfer of training” concept.
Child Developmentalist ideology:
• Use science to study
the child
• Drudgery and
repression are
unnecessary and
thwart a child’s
natural tendencies